Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578092›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

Investigation of mechanical forces during multicellular early angiogenic sprouting by three-dimensional traction force microscopy in hydrogel matrices.

Apeksha Shapeti, Janne de Jong, Jorge Barrasa-Fano, José Antonio Sanz-Herrera, Eva Faurobert, Hans Van Oosterwyck

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Apeksha Shapeti *KU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics section, Leuven, Belgium. apeksha.shapeti@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-9177-3986
Janne de Jong *KU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics section, Leuven, Belgium.
Jorge Barrasa-FanoKU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics section, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8650-0457
José Antonio Sanz-HerreraEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Eva FaurobertUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1209, CNRS 5309, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France.
Hans Van OosterwyckKU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics section, Leuven, Belgium. hans.vanoosterwyck@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-2142-9717

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) 1S68820NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) G087018NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) G0C2422NKU Leuven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) IDN/19/031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the mechanical regulation of angiogenesis remains a challenge owing to the complexities of measuring cellular forces in this dynamic, multicellular and three-dimensional (3D) process. Current methods for force measurements typically involve traction force microscopy (TFM) applied to single cells or monolayers on 2D substrates or to individual cells within 3D extracellular matrix (ECM)-like gels. Here we present a protocol for mimicking and imaging dynamic early angiogenic sprouting into biomimetic matrices compatible with 3D TFM and for visualizing matrix degradation. Given that reliably acquiring sufficiently large 3D TFM datasets in multicellular systems is challenging, our protocol emphasizes best practices for higher-throughput data acquisition and for accurately imaging, analyzing and interpreting cell-ECM forces using our open-source TFMLAB software. As such, this assay provides a defined and reproducible system to study cellular forces and matrix degradation during angiogenesis in response to perturbations of cell-intrinsic signaling and mixed cell populations, as well as ECM cues. We further provide protocols for immunofluorescence analysis of angiogenic sprouts formed within the matrices and their retrieval from the hydrogel for downstream sequencing. Depending on the number of samples, sample preparation can take between 2 h and 4 h followed by a 15-17 h overnight wait time for angiogenic invasion. The 3D TFM data acquisition can take 2-6 h, while downstream processing of samples can take either 1 h (endothelial cell isolation) or up to 5 d (immunofluorescence). Notably, this workflow demands minimal prior expertise in programming, biophysics or molecular biology.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisHydrogelsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID41578092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.