ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Prognostic Value of Non-nodal Regional Metastases in Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Cutaneous Melanoma: Multicenter Analysis of the Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group Database.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Adjuvant Primary Site Radiotherapy for Cutaneous Melanoma Patients with Microsatellitosis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Refining Prognosis in Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma with Non-nodal Regional Metastases.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-nodal regional metastases, including microsatellite lesions, satellites, and in-transit metastases, are an uncommon but aggressive entity in cutaneous melanoma. We evaluated their association with clinicopathological features, sentinel lymph node (SLN) status, and prognosis. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group (SLNWG) database was used to examine the clinicopathological associations of non-nodal regional metastases, their prognostic significance in relation to SLN status, and their impact on clinical outcomes, including in patients with negative SLN status, using multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression models, respectively.
resultsOf 13,474 patients in the SLNWG database, 12,644 underwent SLN biopsy, and 3.4% (n = 426) had non-nodal regional metastases at diagnosis. These were associated with adverse clinicopathological features, higher odds of SLN positivity (OR 2.75; 95% CI 2.18-3.47; P < 0.001), and worse relapse-free survival (RFS: HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.02, P = 0.02), melanoma specific survival (MSS: HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.06-2.78, P = 0.03), overall survival (OS: HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.21, P = 0.05). Adverse prognostic associations were also observed in the SLN negative subgroup (RFS: HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.58-2.36, P < 0.001; MSS: HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.58-3.17, P < 0.001, and OS: HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.17-1.95, P = 0.002).
conclusionsNon-nodal regional metastases independently predict SLN involvement and adverse prognosis, and outcomes remain poor even when SLN is negative. These findings reinforce the risk stratification and prognostic relevance of SLN assessment in clinically node-negative patients with non-nodal regional metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.