ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Reassessing prognostic markers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: the enduring value of body composition, nutritional, and inflammatory indices.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the standard first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), yet many risk factors identified during the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era remain unvalidated in current practice. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of body composition, nutritional, and inflammatory indices in the era of ICI-based first-line therapy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 136 mRCC patients who received systemic therapy. Body composition indices (skeletal muscle index [SMI], visceral adipose tissue index [VATI], subcutaneous adipose tissue index [SATI]), nutritional markers (prognostic nutritional index [PNI], geriatric nutritional risk index [GNRI]), and inflammatory markers (Glasgow Prognostic Score [GPS], systemic inflammatory index [SII], and other indices) were assessed for their association with overall survival (OS). We also compared their prognostic impact on patients treated with non-ICI-based and ICI-based regimens as first-line therapy.
resultsLow VATI (HR 1.64, P = 0.030), and low SATI (HR 2.22, P < 0.001) were associated with shorter survival. PNI (HR 1.70, P < 0.001) and GNRI (HR 1.57, P < 0.001) showed strong prognostic value, as did GPS (HR 2.43, P < 0.001) and SII (HR 2.11, P < 0.001) in the overall cohort. In the ICI-based regimen group, PNI, GNRI, and SATI demonstrated higher prognostic performance (C-indices 0.736, 0.730, and 0.690, respectively), with PNI and SATI providing clear OS stratification.
conclusionSeveral indices reflecting body composition, nutritional status, and systemic inflammation remain valuable prognostic markers in patients with mRCC receiving ICI-based first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.