ArticleNature medicine2026
Principles to guide clinical AI readiness and move from benchmarks to real-world evaluation.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of community-based artificial intelligence screening for retinopathy of prematurity.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Initial lessons from real-world implementation of an AI-agent eye clinic in China.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- AI-based multimodal integration of genomics and electronic health records.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Governing Clinical Readiness Claims Derived from Medical AI Benchmark Results.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Quantifying the AI readiness gap: An international, multidisciplinary assessment of artificial intelligence literacy in the radiation oncology community.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Application of Sparse Autoencoders to Enhance Mechanistic Interpretability of Large Language Models in Medicine.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- In what clinical settings are the MASAI trial results applicable?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
41578031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.