ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Surgical stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis shows a good age-appropriate result regardless of the surgical procedure].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) is becoming increasingly more important due to the demographic changes. Older age and the associated multimorbidity pose a challenge for the optimal treatment of pelvic fractures.
methodA total of 36 patients were included. They were categorized according to the FFP classification with the following distribution: 44.4% FFP II, 16.7% FFP III and 38.9% FFP IV. Transiliosacral screws used unilaterally/bilaterally (cannulated 7.3 mm titanium screws with 32 mm thread, MedTech J&J, Umkirch, Germany) were compared to a continuous transiliosacral sacral rod (cannulated 7.5 mm rod, Marquardt, Spachingen, Germany) for stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring (screw vs. rod) and in combination with or without a ventral supra-acetabular external fixator (steel Schanz screws with cross-connectors classified as ⌀Fix vs. Fix). The parameters measured were the duration of surgery, complication and revision rates and functional outcomes. The quality of life on the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EQ-5D-5L index and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) were compared 1 day, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.
resultsThe mean age of the overall cohort was 81.5 ± 7.7 years and the overall mortality rate was 5.6%. The higher complication (29.4% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.419) and revision rates (5.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.310) of the screw group were not statistically significant. The EQ-VAS, EQ-5D-5L and EMS showed no significant differences between screw vs. rod. The fix group had a longer operation time (47.2 ± 9.2 min vs. 35.2 ± 20.2 min, p = 0.005) but a lower complication rate (11.1% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.306); however, their mobility was significantly reduced postoperatively and after 6 weeks (EMS day 1: 6 ± 4 vs. 11 ± 4, p = 0.003; week 6: 12 ± 2 vs. 16 ± 3, p = 0.010). DISCUSSION: Osteoporosis treatment had not been performed prior to the injury in 64.7% of the injured patients, 29.4% received a basic treatment for osteoporosis and 5.9% received specific treatment for osteoporosis. Surgical treatment of FFP II-IV showed a good clinical outcome with age-appropriate values after 6 months. The clinical outcome was the same after 6 months regardless of the surgical procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41578015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.