ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Prospective real-world implementation of deep learning systems in healthcare: a systematic review guided by implementation science.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participatory Design of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Referral uptake after diabetic retinopathy screening with artificial intelligence-assisted care pathways: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Human-centered digital ecosystem: safeguarding healthcare workers' sleep, ergonomics, and occupational health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From Variant Interpretation to Biomarker Translation: Multi-omics Integration in Inherited Neuromuscular Diseases.Human mutation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) applications in healthcare are expanding beyond proof-of-concept studies. Yet, the extent of its real-world implementation and impact on patient care and clinical workflows remains unclear due to the limited prospective real-world findings. Understanding how DL tools perform in real clinical environments is critical for guiding successful and sustainable deployment. Using a layered methodology with established implementation science frameworks, this systematic review aimed to systematically map the implementation strategies and outcomes of prospective DL implementation studies, proposing recommendations based on identified gaps of relevant studies to serve as a guide for the future implementation of DL systems. 20 articles were included: 3 from radiology, 1 from otolaryngology, 3 from dermatology, and 13 from ophthalmology. All studies assessed clinical outcomes, demonstrating the effectiveness and feasibility of integrating DL systems into existing clinical workflows. Adoption and appropriateness were the most frequently evaluated implementation outcomes; only one study evaluated implementation costs, and none evaluated sustainability. Stakeholder acceptability was only evaluated in 8 studies. Given the paucity of real-world DL implementation research, continued research into the clinical deployment of DL systems using hybrid effectiveness-implementation study designs as a framework is essential to facilitate its seamless and effective adoption into clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.