ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2026
Exploring the Associations of Socioeconomic Status on Meeting the Strength Activity Guideline Among US Adults with Disabilities: 2017-2019 BRFSS.
Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral factors may influence adherence to the recommended twice-weekly strength activity guideline. Currently, there is a paucity of literature examining the associations of socioeconomic status (SES) on meeting the strength activity guideline among adults with disabilities. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the associations of SES on meeting the strength activity guideline among people with disabilities.
methodsUsing data from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 14,425 adults with disabilities were classified as meeting or not meeting the strength activity guideline. Several SES variables, education, employment status, income level, household size, number of children, federal poverty level, partnered status, and homeownership were included in the analysis and served as independent variables. Separate unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were conducted to relate the effect of SES on meeting the strength activity guideline among people with disabilities.
resultsAmong participants, 73.73% (95% CI [72.28, 75.15]) did not meet the guideline. Participants who were college or technical school graduates (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI [1.50, 2.57]) were more likely to meet the strength activity guideline, while other SES variables were found to be not statistically significantly associated with meeting the strength activity guideline (p > .05).
conclusionsMany SES factors were not associated with meeting the strength activity guideline among people with disabilities. Future targeted strategies may need to consider factors besides SES factors of people with disabilities to promote adherence to the strength activity guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41577937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.