ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
Advancing Quantitative ADA Detection Through Model Informed Assay Development (MIAD).
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced assay design for characterizing anti-drug antibody responses in clinical serum samples.Bioanalysis · 2026Review
- In Vivo Clearance of Immune Complexes: Insights Into Human Drug/Anti-Drug Antibody Complex Clearance Dynamics.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunogenicity testing for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is crucial in therapeutic protein development, yet current quasi-quantitative assays struggle to accurately measure ADAs when the antibodies have different binding strength (affinities) or due to heterogeneity of ADAs and residual drug interference. While traditional QC-based assay development is limited by the lack of representative ADA reference standards, we propose Model-Informed Assay Development (MIAD) as a transformative solution. MIAD mathematically simulates complex analyte-reagent interactions to identify optimal conditions for signal-generating analyte-reagent complex (ARC) formation, enabling scientifically sound assay optimization independent of positive controls. Our findings demonstrate that optimal sample dilution and reagent concentrations can overcome drug interference and improved detection of antibodies (ADAs) with different binding strengths. This work applies MIAD to address critical ADA assay challenges: drug tolerance and affinity-dependent detectability. We tested MIAD's prediction in three real world case studies and found strong agreement. Our findings show that optimized sample dilutions and reagent concentrations effectively overcome drug interference and affinity differences, enhancing ADA detectability and recovery. MIAD also helps understanding whether a hook-shaped curve is due to a prozone effect or drug interference, guiding the development of unbiased assays crucial for accurate S/N-based magnitude estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41577877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.