Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577877›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2026

Advancing Quantitative ADA Detection Through Model Informed Assay Development (MIAD).

Gregor Jordan, Roland F Staack

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregor JordanRoche Pharma Research & Early Development (pRED), Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bioanalysis & Biomarkers, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Nonnenwald 2, 82377, Penzberg, Germany. gregor.jordan@roche.com.ORCID 0009-0002-7779-8690
Roland F StaackRoche Pharma Research & Early Development (pRED), Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bioanalysis & Biomarkers, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Nonnenwald 2, 82377, Penzberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunogenicity testing for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is crucial in therapeutic protein development, yet current quasi-quantitative assays struggle to accurately measure ADAs when the antibodies have different binding strength (affinities) or due to heterogeneity of ADAs and residual drug interference. While traditional QC-based assay development is limited by the lack of representative ADA reference standards, we propose Model-Informed Assay Development (MIAD) as a transformative solution. MIAD mathematically simulates complex analyte-reagent interactions to identify optimal conditions for signal-generating analyte-reagent complex (ARC) formation, enabling scientifically sound assay optimization independent of positive controls. Our findings demonstrate that optimal sample dilution and reagent concentrations can overcome drug interference and improved detection of antibodies (ADAs) with different binding strengths. This work applies MIAD to address critical ADA assay challenges: drug tolerance and affinity-dependent detectability. We tested MIAD's prediction in three real world case studies and found strong agreement. Our findings show that optimized sample dilutions and reagent concentrations effectively overcome drug interference and affinity differences, enhancing ADA detectability and recovery. MIAD also helps understanding whether a hook-shaped curve is due to a prozone effect or drug interference, guiding the development of unbiased assays crucial for accurate S/N-based magnitude estimation.

Indexed as

AntibodiesModels, TheoreticalHumansImmunoassayAntibodiesADAaffinitydrug interferenceimmunogenicitysignal-to-noise

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.