Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577703›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

iDesignGPT enhances conceptual design via large language model agentic workflows.

Songkai Liu, Yanqing Shen, Yilun Zhang, Zhangli Hou, Xin Wang, Jianxi Luo, Zhinan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Songkai LiuState Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yanqing ShenHerbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yilun ZhangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhangli HouSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xin WangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. wangxinmandy@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5115-8236
Jianxi LuoDepartment of Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhinan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. zhinanz@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-7840

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52575220National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) No. 52505271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conceptual engineering system design faces challenges from traditional methods and emerging AI tools to fully address its inherently complex, dynamic, and creativity-driven demands. iDesignGPT is a framework that integrates large language models with established design methodologies to enable dynamic multi-agent collaboration for problem refinement, information gathering, design space exploration, and evaluation. By incorporating design metrics such as coverage, diversity, and novelty, iDesignGPT provides quantitative insights for early-stage conceptual design. Performance evaluations across six public design challenges show that iDesignGPT achieves competitive novelty and consistently higher originality and modularity than GPT-4o zero-shot, GPT-4o chain-of-thought and Deepseek-r1, based on metrics and expert assessments. Two controlled user studies show positive reception across profiles and, for novice designers, lower mental demand than human-only design and clearer design flow with iDesignGPT. These results establish iDesignGPT as a practical framework for integrating language-model agents with established engineering design methods, enabling metrics-driven support for conceptual design by both expert and novice designers.

Identifiers

PMID41577703
PMCPMC12936183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.