ArticleScientific reports2026
Pore-scale influence of surfactants on evaporation in a porous medium.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite their widespread use in controlling interfacial behavior in porous media, the pore-scale influence of surfactants on evaporation is still not well understood. This study examines how varying concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) modify evaporation dynamics within a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic network. Evaporation experiments were conducted using pure water and SDS solutions at 0.10 wt.% (below the critical micelle concentration, CMC), 0.23 wt.% (at CMC), 0.3 wt.%, and 0.5 wt.% (above CMC). High-resolution imaging and image analysis enabled direct quantification of liquid saturation, meniscus evolution, and contact angle behavior. At the CMC, SDS reduced surface tension from 72 mN/m to 40 mN/m, lowered capillary entry pressures, and promoted air invasion that completed evaporation 47% faster than water. Below the CMC, partial surface tension reduction improved early drainage but sustained thin films that delayed complete evaporation. The results show that tuning surfactant concentration near the CMC effectively controls pore-scale drainage and evaporation kinetics. These findings provide a foundation for developing predictive models and optimizing the design of porous materials for applications involving controlled evaporation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.