ReviewExpert review of respiratory medicine2026
Biomarkers for the diagnosis and phenotyping of acute chest syndrome in patients with sickle cell disease.
Review in Expert review of respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAcute Chest Syndrome (ACS) is a serious and often fatal complication of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). In the absence of specific biomarkers that indicate the development of ACS, diagnosis can be nebulous and difficult. In this narrative literature review, we examine the current evidence for novel biomarkers associated with acute and long-term propensity toward ACS. AREAS COVERED: A search focused on terms related to 'acute chest syndrome,' 'sickle cell anemia,' and 'biomarkers' was created and run by a medical librarian in MEDLINE (Ovid), Google Scholar, and Embase (Ovid). Four-hundred seven articles were found in the initial search. After duplicates removed and irrelevant studies excluded, 13 were included for final data extraction. Data extraction was completed by three authors and collated to form the final manuscript. EXPERT OPINION: Currently, ACS diagnosis remains a great challenge. The reviewed literature shows promise in both novel biomarkers like sputum IL-6 and alternative interpretations of routine studies including blood counts and inflammatory markers. Still, large, multicenter trials to validate reliable and specific markers for ACS remain elusive. Isolating a dependable, rapid, and widely available and affordable biomarker for ACS may help diagnose and change morbidity and mortality from one of SCD's most fatal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.