Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577452›Full record

ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2026

Machine learning for RNA secondary structure prediction: a review of current methods and challenges.

Giuseppe Sacco, Giovanni Bussi, Guido Sanguinetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giuseppe SaccoScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, SISSA, Trieste 34136, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-0594-8349
Giovanni BussiScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, SISSA, Trieste 34136, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9216-5782
Guido SanguinettiScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, SISSA, Trieste 34136, Italy gsanguin@sissa.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-8336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the secondary structure of RNA is a core challenge in computational biology, essential for understanding molecular function and designing novel therapeutics. The field has evolved from foundational but accuracy-limited thermodynamic approaches to a new data-driven paradigm dominated by machine learning and deep learning. These models learn folding patterns directly from data, leading to significant performance gains. This review surveys the modern landscape of these methods, covering single-sequence, evolutionary-based, and hybrid models that blend machine learning with biophysics. A central theme is the field's "generalization crisis," where powerful models were found to fail on new RNA families, prompting a community-wide shift to stricter, homology-aware benchmarking. In response to the underlying challenge of data scarcity, RNA foundation models have emerged, learning from massive, unlabeled sequence corpora to improve generalization. Finally, we look ahead to the next set of major hurdles-including the accurate prediction of complex motifs like pseudoknots, scaling to kilobase-length transcripts, incorporating the chemical diversity of modified nucleotides, and shifting the prediction target from static structures to the dynamic ensembles that better capture biological function. We also highlight the need for a standardized, prospective benchmarking system to ensure unbiased validation and accelerate progress.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMachine LearningNucleic Acid ConformationRNAPrediction AlgorithmsRNA FoldingThermodynamicsRNAdeep learningfoundation modelsmachine learningRNA secondary structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID41577452
PMCPMC12990806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.