Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577447›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

The Ventral Attention Network Mediates Attentional Reorienting to Cross-Modal Expectancy Violations: Evidence from EEG and fMRI.

Soukhin Das, Sreenivasan Meyyappan, Evelijne M Bekker, Sharon Corina, Mingzhou Ding, George R Mangun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soukhin DasCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618 soukhind2@gmail.com.
Sreenivasan MeyyappanCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618.
Evelijne M BekkerCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618.
Sharon CorinaCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618.
Mingzhou DingPruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.ORCID 0000-0002-1024-3503
George R MangunCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618.

Funding

Mechanisms of attentional control: Structure and dynamics from simultaneous EEG-fMRI and machine learningR01MH117991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DING, MINGZHOU, MANGUN, GEORGE R · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our daily interactions with the world are shaped by sensory expectations informed by context and prior experiences, which in turn influence how we allocate our attention. Prominent predictive coding models suggest that sensory expectancy and attention interact but disagree on the precise mechanisms. One possibility is that the ventral attention network (VAN) may play a role by facilitating attentional reorienting when expectancy is violated. To test this in humans (23 males and 43 females), we employed an auditory-visual trial-by-trial cueing paradigm in three experiments integrating EEG and fMRI to investigate the VAN's role in violations of cross-modal expectancy. Behavioral results showed faster responses to expected targets, confirming the efficacy of cue-induced expectations in orienting attention to the expected target modality. EEG analyses revealed differences in early (∼100 ms latency) event-related potentials (ERPs) to both auditory and visual stimuli when expectations were violated. Unexpected stimuli elicited significantly larger early-latency negative ERPs, across both modalities. Source localization of these ERPs and subsequent fMRI evidence revealed activation in the right VAN. Functional connectivity analyses showed greater coupling between VAN regions and sensory cortices, with modality-specific pathways involving superior temporal gyrus for auditory and fusiform gyrus for visual targets. These findings demonstrate that expectancy violations recruit the VAN to reorient attention and resolve sensory conflict. By coordinating top-down control and bottom-up sensory input, the VAN supports adaptive responses to unexpected stimuli. This work advances our understanding of predictive processing in multisensory perception and highlights the VAN's central role in flexible cognitive control.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainNerve NetOrientationAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOutcome ExpectationsattentionERPexpectationfMRIpredictionVAN

Identifiers

PMID41577447
PMCPMC12925663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.