Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577352›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Measurement instruments for assessing support needs of dementia caregivers: a COSMIN-based systematic review protocol.

Chunju Xiang, Yingjie Shen, Yijia Zhuo, Xinyue Zhao, Beibei Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chunju XiangSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6622-0155
Yingjie ShenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Malaya, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia shenyingjie2024@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-8449
Yijia ZhuoSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7266-9077
Xinyue ZhaoSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7879-4687
Beibei QiaoSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6224-5917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSupporting dementia caregivers is essential for improving patient outcomes and reducing caregiver burden, and it has become a core element of comprehensive dementia care. Accurate assessment of caregivers' support needs is crucial for designing effective and targeted interventions. Although several instruments have been developed to assess these needs, there is limited evidence from systematic reviews regarding their measurement properties. Conducting a systematic review of the psychometric evidence for these instruments is therefore necessary to inform the selection and application of reliable tools in both research and practice. This review aims to identify and evaluate existing instruments for measuring support needs among dementia caregivers, summarise their psychometric properties and provide evidence-based recommendations for their use and future development. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2015 guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted in eight electronic databases from 1 August 2025 to 31 January 2026 to identify studies reporting the development or use of instruments measuring support needs among dementia caregivers. Two reviewers will independently perform literature screening, data extraction and methodological quality assessment, with disagreements resolved by discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. The measurement properties of the included instruments will be appraised in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study as it will use data from previously published literature. The results of this systematic review will be disseminated through presentations at national and/or international conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251129741.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaNeeds AssessmentSocial SupportHumansPsychometricsResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicCaregiversDementiaSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID41577352
PMCPMC12853497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.