ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2026
Massive pulmonary embolism masquerading as acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be a challenging and fatal diagnosis, especially with a negative D-dimer test, which may lead to underestimation of PE risk. A 70-year-old woman presented with chest pain, breathlessness and orthostatic presyncope. Her electrocardiogram had antero-lateral ischaemic changes, with a troponin of 62, lactate 3.4 and negative D-dimer. She was treated as having acute coronary syndrome until she became hypoxaemic, hypotensive and tachycardic. Point-of-care echocardiography revealed a dilated right atrium containing an echogenic mass, moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation, a dilated right ventricle and dilated inferior vena cava. McConnell's sign was positive. CT pulmonary angiogram confirmed a central PE, and she was thrombolysed with alteplase. Clinicians should be aware that central PEs can present with typical anginal symptoms, pre-syncope or syncope. A negative D-dimer test with an age-adjusted cut-off may help exclude PE in patients with low or intermediate clinical probability, but should not be used for higher-risk patients. In this case, echocardiography played a crucial role in the diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.