SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2026
Systematic Review of Nonmedical Costs of Firearm Injury.
Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo evaluate the impact of firearm injury prevention programs and policies, it is important to characterize firearm injury costs. A prior review evaluated medical-specific firearm injury costs, but nonmedical societal costs have not been previously reviewed. This study explicitly reviews the nonmedical costs of both fatal and nonfatal firearm injury.
methodsA systematic review of studies conducted from 2000 to 2023 in English reporting nonmedical costs of U.S. firearm injury in Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EconLit, JSTOR, and gray literature was performed. The methods, data quality, types of nonmedical costs, and the relationship between nonmedical and medical costs were extracted. Bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and synthesized on the basis of the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) guidelines.
resultsNineteen studies analyzing national, state, city, and individual costs were identified. Studies generally used modeling approaches (13 studies) to calculate costs, but 4 used a cohort approach, and 2 used a willingness-to-pay approach. Studies evaluated wide ranges of costs: medical, productivity, intangible (quality of life), criminal justice, and other costs. In studies evaluating both medical and nonmedical costs, nonmedical costs were much higher, with criminal justice costs being 1.5-3.9 times larger, productivity costs being 14-25 times larger, and intangible costs being 29-175 times larger than medical costs. DISCUSSION: The literature on nonmedical costs is relatively underdeveloped, leading to wide ranges in results. Studies consistently show that nonmedical costs are in orders of magnitude larger than medical costs of firearm injury with total costs potentially in the millions of dollars per injury. More research on nonmedical costs of firearm injury will help quantify and clarify the magnitude of these costs as well as be used to understand the cost-savings of specific prevention policies or programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.