ReviewCell reports. Medicine2026
Pipe dream to pipeline: Journey of cancer vaccines and the road ahead.
Review in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Programming the immunological properties of mRNA vaccines for cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic melanoma vaccines: Platforms, neoantigen strategies, and emerging combination immunotherapies.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, clinical trials of therapeutic cancer vaccines have evolved substantially in scope and design, renewing interest in this immunotherapy modality. Advances in sequencing technologies and an improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment have enabled precise targeting of tumor neoantigens, accelerating the development of personalized cancer vaccines. In this review, we critically evaluate the current landscape of cancer vaccines, particularly neoantigen-based approaches, in light of recent clinical trial data. Although cancer vaccines have historically demonstrated limited efficacy as monotherapies, growing evidence suggests enhanced clinical benefit when combined with other anti-cancer treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. Drawing on these findings, we summarize key lessons from past efforts and highlight persistent knowledge gaps that limit broader clinical success. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies to overcome these challenges, with the aim of improving vaccine efficacy and facilitating the integration of cancer vaccines into standard-of-care treatment for cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.