Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41576369›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Impact of Cytisinicline Maintenance Therapy in Patients Who Are Candidates for Smoking Cessation: Protocol for a Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial (CITISILONG Trial).

Carlos Rabade Castedo, Ana Estany-Gestal, Carlos A Jiménez Ruiz, José Ignacio de Granda-Orive, Juan Antonio Riesco-Miranda, María Isabel Cristóbal Fernández, Angela Ramos-Pinedo, Jaime Signes-Costa Miñana, María Inmaculada Gorordo-Unzueta, Agustin Valido-Morales and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carlos Rabade CastedoDepartment of Pulmonology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6832-3875
Ana Estany-Gestal *Research Methodology Unit, Health Research Institute, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7997-3603
Carlos A Jiménez Ruiz *Smoking Cessation Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-1676-9191
José Ignacio de Granda-Orive *Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5433-0561
Juan Antonio Riesco-Miranda *Department of Pulmonology, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7418-0759
María Isabel Cristóbal Fernández *Smoking Cessation Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0005-0076-7820
Angela Ramos-Pinedo *Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1778-633X
Jaime Signes-Costa MiñanaDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8221-6045
María Inmaculada Gorordo-Unzueta *Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Galdakao-Usánsolo, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-5685
Agustin Valido-MoralesDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8771-7463
Jacobo Sellarés-Torres *Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5403-5688
Eva Cabrera-César *Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1288-7887
Alejandro Frino-GarcíaDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4426-5313
Luis Valdés CuadradoDepartment of Pulmonology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-8013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytisinicline has proven to be an effective, efficient, and safe molecule in smoking cessation. However, the established 25-day regimen could be insufficient in a high percentage of smokers, so it is necessary to study maintained therapies of this drug.

objectiveThis study aims to compare the efficacy of the cytisinicline regimen used in routine clinical practice versus 2 maintained regimens of 50 and 75 days, respectively. In addition, the safety and economic impact of each regime will be determined.

methodsA prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel, phase IV clinical trial of 402 smoker patients prepared to quit smoking. The study was conducted in 10 hospitals in Spain. A control group is compared to 2 intervention groups in which the duration of the drug is increased without increasing its dose, administering half and all, respectively, of an additional marketed container that includes 100 tablets. Thus, participants will be randomized to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive cytisinicline: (1) a control group treated with cytisinicline according to the usual clinical guidelines and product information (25 days); (2) a group with a 50-day cytisinicline regimen (an additional 25 days at a dose of 1.5 mg every 12 hours), seeking to increase its efficacy while minimally impacting adherence; and (3) a group with a 75-day regimen (an additional 50 days at a dose of 1.5 mg every 12 hours), attempting to increase its efficacy, although the longer duration of the drug may threaten adherence. Efficacy in the 3 arms will be analyzed through sustained abstinence at 6 and 12 months, point abstinence rate assessed every 7 days, and abstinence rate from Day 25 to Day 50 and from Day 25 to Day 75 in the 3 study arms. (1) The variation in withdrawal and craving symptoms in the 3 groups, (2) safety through the percentage of adverse events in the 3 treatment arms, and (3) economic impact by evaluating the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios of the 2 prolonged regimens versus the usual clinical cytisinicline regimen. To calculate the differences between the 3 groups for each outcome variable, a univariate analysis will be performed. Statistically significant variables will be included in a multivariate model.

resultsRecruitment for the trial and patient enrollment were completed in November 2026. Follow-up of all participants will extend to December 2027.

conclusionsIn conclusion, this study evaluates the optimization of cytisinicline in daily clinical practice, increasing the benefits of its pharmaceutical properties without affecting patient safety. All of this will improve the effectiveness of smoking cessation by reducing the number of smokers, which implies lower morbidity and mortality and lower costs associated with smoking.

trial registrationEuropean Clinical Trials Register 2024-518936-36-00; https://euclinicaltrials.eu/ctis-public/view/2024-518936-36-00. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/76815.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationAdultClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesSpainTreatment Outcomecytisiniclineefficacymaintenance therapysafetysmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID41576369
PMCPMC12881894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.