Trial reportJMIR mental health2026
Examining the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Self-Directed, Web-Based Resource for Stress and Coping in University: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: University students face high levels of stress with limited support for coping and well-being. Campus mental health services are increasingly using digital resources to support students' stress management and coping capacity. However, the effectiveness of providing this support through web-based, self-directed means remains unclear. Objective: Using a randomized controlled design, this study examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a self-directed, web-based resource containing evidence-based strategies for stress management and healthy coping for university students. The study additionally explored the potential benefits of screening and directing students to personalized resources aligned with their needs. Methods: Participants consisted of 242 university students (193/242, 79.9% women; mean age 21.15 years) assigned to one of 3 groups (ie, automatically directed to personalized resources, nondirected, and waitlist comparison). They completed pre, post (4 wk), and follow-up (8 wk) measures for stress, coping, and well-being. The resource groups also completed acceptability measures at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the web-based resource access. Results: Results indicate high acceptability, reflecting students' satisfaction with the resource. Furthermore, significant decreases in stress and unhealthy coping, as well as significant increases in coping self-efficacy and healthy coping in the resource groups relative to the comparison group, were found. Interestingly, the directed approach showed no added benefit over nondirected resource access. Conclusions: In summary, this study demonstrates the acceptability and effectiveness of a self-directed digital resource platform as a viable support option for university student stress and coping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.