Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41576346›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mental health2026

Examining the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Self-Directed, Web-Based Resource for Stress and Coping in University: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bilun Naz Böke, Jessica Mettler, Laurianne Bastien, Sohyun Cho, Nancy Heath

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bilun Naz BökeDepartment of Educational and Counselling Psychology, Faculty of Education, McGill University, 3700 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC, H3A1X1, Canada, 1 5143984242.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-7216
Jessica MettlerDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-2881
Laurianne BastienDepartment of Educational and Counselling Psychology, Faculty of Education, McGill University, 3700 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC, H3A1X1, Canada, 1 5143984242.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4379-6024
Sohyun ChoDepartment of Educational and Counselling Psychology, Faculty of Education, McGill University, 3700 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC, H3A1X1, Canada, 1 5143984242.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-9263
Nancy HeathDepartment of Educational and Counselling Psychology, Faculty of Education, McGill University, 3700 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC, H3A1X1, Canada, 1 5143984242.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8062-7801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: University students face high levels of stress with limited support for coping and well-being. Campus mental health services are increasingly using digital resources to support students' stress management and coping capacity. However, the effectiveness of providing this support through web-based, self-directed means remains unclear. Objective: Using a randomized controlled design, this study examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a self-directed, web-based resource containing evidence-based strategies for stress management and healthy coping for university students. The study additionally explored the potential benefits of screening and directing students to personalized resources aligned with their needs. Methods: Participants consisted of 242 university students (193/242, 79.9% women; mean age 21.15 years) assigned to one of 3 groups (ie, automatically directed to personalized resources, nondirected, and waitlist comparison). They completed pre, post (4 wk), and follow-up (8 wk) measures for stress, coping, and well-being. The resource groups also completed acceptability measures at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the web-based resource access. Results: Results indicate high acceptability, reflecting students' satisfaction with the resource. Furthermore, significant decreases in stress and unhealthy coping, as well as significant increases in coping self-efficacy and healthy coping in the resource groups relative to the comparison group, were found. Interestingly, the directed approach showed no added benefit over nondirected resource access. Conclusions: In summary, this study demonstrates the acceptability and effectiveness of a self-directed digital resource platform as a viable support option for university student stress and coping.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalInternetInternet-Based InterventionPatient Acceptance of Health CareStress, PsychologicalStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleUniversitiesYoung Adultcopingself-directed programmingstressuniversity studentsweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID41576346
PMCPMC12829895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.