Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41576138›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2026

Pregnancy outcomes in women at high risk of preterm birth receiving a vaginal cervical cerclage with, or without, progesterone: A retrospective, secondary analysis of the C-STICH randomised controlled trial data.

Victoria Hodgetts Morton, Katie Morris, Philip Toozs-Hobson, Lee Middleton, Nicole Pilarski, Lilah Bell, Martha Hogg, Rebecca Man, Fidan Israfil-Bayli, Andrew Shennan and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Victoria Hodgetts MortonDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-4313
Katie MorrisDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-429X
Philip Toozs-HobsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lee MiddletonDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Nicole PilarskiDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lilah BellCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7379-4107
Martha HoggCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4531-5615
Rebecca ManDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0983-7590
Fidan Israfil-BayliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Andrew ShennanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-3132
Nigel SimpsonLeeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Christoph LeesDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine MoakesDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-0532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaginal cervical cerclage and progesterone are established treatments for prevention of pregnancy loss and prematurity. There is limited data to assess the effect of these treatments in combination. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between progesterone and no progesterone treatment on pregnancy outcomes in women at high risk of preterm birth who had received a vaginal cervical cerclage. METHODS AND

findingsThis is a secondary post-hoc analysis of women recruited to the C-STICH randomised controlled trial, which recruited in 75 obstetric units in the UK between 2015 and 2021. In the C-STICH trial, women with a singleton pregnancy, receiving a vaginal cervical cerclage due to a history of pregnancy loss or premature birth, or if indicated by ultrasound, were randomised to cerclage with braided or monofilament suture, with a primary outcome of pregnancy loss, defined as miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death in the first week of life. In this secondary analysis, the primary outcome was pregnancy loss, defined as miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life. Secondary maternal outcomes included miscarriage and previable neonatal death; stillbirth; gestational age at delivery; preterm pre labour rupture of membranes, and sepsis. Secondary neonatal outcomes included early/late neonatal death and sepsis. For each outcome, regression models were fitted adjusting for prespecified prognostic variables. From the 2,048 women recruited to C-STICH, 1943 (95%) women had a vaginal cerclage placed and available progesterone data. Of these, 834 (43%) women received progesterone and 1,109 (57%) did not receive progesterone. In women with primary outcome data available, in our predefined analysis pregnancy loss occurred in 49 (5.9%) of 832 women who received progesterone and 91 (8.3%) of 1,103 women who did not receive progesterone (adjusted* risk ratio 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.50, 0.99]); adjusted risk difference -0.02 (95% CI [-0.04, -0.001], *adjusted for indication, obstetric history, surgical technique, and maternal age). Further exploratory analysis excluding women who had termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly demonstrated a nonsignificant reduction in the risk of pregnancy loss. Key limitations of this study include a nonrandomised trial design and unknown confounding relating to variation in progesterone use.

conclusionIn women with a vaginal cervical cerclage and concomitant progesterone there appears to be an association with a reduced risk of pregnancy loss. This combination therapy may be an important opportunity to further reduce the risk of pregnancy loss in this high-risk cohort.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthProgesteroneProgestinsAbortion, SpontaneousAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStillbirthProgesteroneProgestins

Identifiers

PMID41576138
PMCPMC12872024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.