Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41576077›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Social movements are transformative agents for biodiversity conservation.

Mariana Walter, Arnim Scheidel, Clara Vadez, Daniela Del Bene, Leah Temper, Eleonora Fanari, Victoria Reyes-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social mobilizations for sustainability transformations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Social movements are transformative agents for biodiversity conservation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariana Walter *Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals, Barcelona 08005, Spain.
Arnim Scheidel *Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
Clara VadezDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom.
Daniela Del BeneDepartment of Asian and North African Studies, Ca' Foscari University, Venice 30123, Italy.
Leah TemperHealth and Economic Policy Program, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Toronto 19008, Ontario, Canada.
Eleonora FanariInstitut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
Victoria Reyes-García *Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2914-8055

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) FP7-771056-LICCIMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) CEX2019-000940-MMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) RYC2020-029088-IMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) RYC2022-037653-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Civil society has long been a catalyst for social change by reshaping structures, influencing values, and challenging power dynamics; however, its role in driving transformative change for biodiversity remains underexplored. To address this gap, we analyze 2,801 socio-environmental mobilizations documented in the Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas). These mobilizations produce diverse outcomes that reveal distinct spatial, temporal, and sectoral patterns and proactively and reactively respond to environmental impacts across the globe. Notably, about 40% of these mobilizations occur within the top 30% of global priority lands for species conservation and their actions contribute to the achievement of key Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets focused on ecosystem protection, restoration, sustainable use, and inclusive spatial planning. Yet, one-third of mobilizations face repression, criminalization, or violence-pressures that are even more common in high-priority conservation areas. Moreover, mobilizations facing repressive outcomes contest environmental threats relevant for the KMGBF targets more extensively than those with progressive outcomes, underscoring the risks faced by movements driving biodiversity protection in critical regions. To amplify the transformative potential of socio-environmental mobilizations, we emphasize the importance of recognizing, strengthening, and protecting them through coordinated action among diverse social actors. By fostering collaboration and targeted resource allocation, these efforts can empower socio-environmental mobilizations to catalyze meaningful and lasting change for biodiversity conservation.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesSocial ChangeEcosystemHumansbiodiversity conservationenvironmental justicesocial movementstransformative change

Identifiers

PMID41576077
PMCPMC12846819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.