ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Generalizations of the quadratic bound optimization principle.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quadratic bound (QB) principle proposed by Böhning and Lindsay in 1988 is an important special case of the majorization-minimization or minorization-maximization optimization principle. The quadratic upper-bound (QUB) principle is pertinent to minimization; the analogous quadratic lower-bound principle is pertinent to maximization. Unfortunately, in minimizing a loss [Formula: see text], the QUB principle is limited by the difficulty of finding a constant positive definite matrix [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] is positive semidefinite for all [Formula: see text]. This paper proposes a generalization of the QB principle that avoids this limitation. In particular, we construct QUB algorithms by replacing the matrix [Formula: see text] by a continuous matrix-valued function [Formula: see text] that dominates the Hessian [Formula: see text] and depends on the both the current iterate [Formula: see text] and the next potential iterate [Formula: see text]. In practice, we require [Formula: see text] to be diagonal with its diagonal entries separated in [Formula: see text]. In other words, the [Formula: see text]th diagonal entry of [Formula: see text] depends on [Formula: see text] only through its [Formula: see text]th entry [Formula: see text]. Theoretical analysis confirms that this class of generalized QB algorithms enjoys global convergence in favorable circumstances. For the scalar case, the tangency condition that the second derivative equals the bound function at the current point promotes superlinear convergence. Several numerical experiments implemented in Julia illustrate the power of the generalized QB principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.