Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41576071›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Clever algorithms for glasses work by time reparameterization.

Federico Ghimenti, Ludovic Berthier, Jorge Kurchan, Frédéric van Wijland

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clever algorithms for glasses work by time reparameterization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Federico GhimentiLaboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes, Université Paris Cité & CNRS (UMR 7057), Paris 75013, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-5915
Ludovic BerthierLaboratoire Charles Coulomb, Université de Montpellier & CNRS (UMR 5221), Montpellier 34095, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-702X
Jorge KurchanLaboratoire de Physique de l'École Normale Supérieure, École Normale Supérieure, Paris 75005, France.
Frédéric van WijlandDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Funding

ANR THEMA AAPG2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ultraslow dynamics of glass-formers has been explained by two views often considered as mutually exclusive: One invokes locally hindered mobility, and the other rests on the complexity of the configuration space. Here, we show that time evolution responds strongly to details of the dynamics by changing the speed of time flow: It has time-reparameterization softness. This finding reconciles both views: While local constraints reparameterize the flow of time, the global landscape determines relationships between different correlations at the same times. We show that modern algorithms developed to accelerate the relaxation to equilibrium act by changing the time reparameterization. Their success thus relies on their ability to exploit reparameterization softness. We conjecture that these results extend beyond the realm of glasses to the optimization of more general constraint satisfaction problems and to broader classes of algorithms.

Indexed as

glassessampling algorithmstime reparameterization

Identifiers

PMID41576071
PMCPMC12846821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.