Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41576053›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Effect of graphene addition on tensile, flexural, and hardness behavior of GFRP composites.

Siraganahalli N Nagesh, Chamarajanagar G Ramachandra, Pallagatte C Aruna Kumara, Praveen Kumar Kanti, Chander Prakash, Sandeep Kumar, Gabr Goshu Syum, Archana Bhat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siraganahalli N NageshFaculty, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, India.
Chamarajanagar G RamachandraFaculty, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Presidency University, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-9029
Pallagatte C Aruna KumaraFaculty, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, India.
Praveen Kumar KantiCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chikara University Institule of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Chander PrakashResearch and Innovation Cell, Rayat Bahra University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Sandeep KumarResearch and Innovation Cell, Bahra University, Waknaghat, India.
Gabr Goshu SyumCentre of Studies in Oil and Gas Engineering and Technology(CS-OGET), Eduardo Mondlane University, Bairro Luís Cabral, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3070-3443
Archana BhatNitte (Deemed to be University), NSAM First Grade College (NSAMFGC), Department of Computer Science, Udupi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer Matrix Composites represent a new generation of engineering materials in which matrix materials are altered by reinforcing filler materials to enhance strength and other properties. In the present work, the Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites were fabricated by adding different compositions of Graphene as a Nano filler material using the Hand layup technique, followed by the Vacuum bagging process. The Graphene filler material was varied from 0 wt. %, 2 wt. %, and 4 wt. %. The prepared composites were characterized by subjecting them to various mechanical tests such as tensile test, flexural test, and micro hardness test. The experimental results revealed an increase in tensile strength by 5.48%, flexural strength by 27.74%, and a reduction in microhardness by 20% for 4 wt. % filler added GFRP compared to neat GFRP, indicating reduced brittleness and enhanced ductility. Furthermore, addition of graphene resulted in a 9% increase in elongation and improved interfacial bonding between glass fiber and epoxy matrix was observed. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis confirmed uniform graphene dispersion, reduced voids, and improved fiber-matrix adhesion. The results demonstrate that the inclusion of 4 wt. % graphene filler achieves an optimal balance between strength, flexibility, and interfacial bonding, making these composites suitable for structural and lightweight applications.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsGlassGraphitePolymersFlexural StrengthHardnessMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningTensile StrengthComposite ResinsfiberglassGraphitePolymers

Identifiers

PMID41576053
PMCPMC12829930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.