ArticlePloS one2026
Effectiveness of roadside alcohol testing in reducing fatal accidents and fatal drinking-driving accidents: A multi-city study in China.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the dynamic relationship between roadside alcohol check rates and traffic mortality across 248 cities in mainland China from 2014 to 2020. Using a dataset comprising 365,753 roadside check arrests, 227,896 traffic deaths, and 21,036 DUI-related fatalities, we applied both traditional time series analysis (Vector Autoregression and Impulse Response Functions) and machine learning techniques (XGBoost) to explore temporal and nonlinear patterns. The time series analysis revealed an initial positive association between enforcement intensity and mortality rates, likely reflecting reactive increases in checks following fatality rises. However, a longer-term beneficial effect emerged after approximately eight months, particularly pronounced in smaller cities. Machine learning models revealed that roadside check rates are more strongly associated with overall traffic mortality than with DUI-specific deaths. Enforcement was found to have a greater impact in smaller cities compared to larger ones. Notably, the patterns reveal diminishing returns in enforcement effectiveness, with the marginal benefits tapering off around 0.002 per 100,000 people per month in large cities, while remaining evident up to about 0.006 in small cities. These findings suggest that increasing roadside checks in low population density areas may lead to the most significant reductions in traffic fatalities at the national level. However, limitations include data exclusions due to non-disclosure and the inability to determine causal mechanisms. Overall, the study offers valuable insights for optimizing DUI enforcement strategies, highlighting the importance of tailored approaches based on city size and enforcement thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.