ArticlePloS one2026
A cross-national study examining imaginary companions and face pareidolia in British and Chinese adults.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although imaginary companions are created by children and sometimes adults around the world, the prevalence of this play behaviour varies. Cross-nationally, imaginary companions are reported more frequently in Western countries. These imaginary entities have been speculated to be similar to hallucination-like-experiences, based on evidence for elevated top-down auditory processing in children who report them. Face pareidolia tasks engage visual top-down processing, and performance on them does not tend to vary across cultures. This study asked if: 1) there would be cross-national differences in imaginary companion creation in childhood and adulthood between Chinese and British adults, 2) whether those creating imaginary companions would see more face pareidolia and 3) if there would be cross-national differences in face pareidolia. 291 participants (185 Chinese) completed a questionnaire on their imagination followed by a face pareidolia task consisting of 36 image trials (24 containing face pareidolia). Results showed that including all participants (Chinese and British) 11% of the adults currently had an imaginary companion. Chinese adults were significantly less likely than British adults to report a childhood, but not adulthood, imaginary companion. There were significantly more reports of face pareidolia from participants with a current imaginary companion, but not those who remembered a companion in childhood. The pareidolia hits did not differ between country, but false alarms were experienced significantly more by the Chinese participants. Taken together, the results provide more information around imaginary companion creation in China and the UK as well as the role top-down processing may play in imaginary companion interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.