ArticlePloS one2026
Do sheep-grazed pastures support insectivorous bat activity and bat species richness?
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arable agriculture is usually associated with monoculture and the usage of pesticides, which jeopardize biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Grazing livestock can potentially benefit bats, however, most studies evaluate cattle, and it is unclear whether the results apply to grazing sheep. We assessed the effects of grazing sheep on insectivorous bat activity and species richness in southern Burgenland, Austria. We conducted acoustic surveys during the summer of 2019 on 49 pastures, which were in each case temporally divided into three categories (pre-grazed, grazed, and post-grazed). During the surveys, 20 of Burgenland's 24 different bat species were detected. The most prevalent species was Pipistrellus pygmaeus. Small aerial insectivores showed significantly higher activity in grazed and post-grazed pastures compared to pre-grazed pastures, with no difference between grazed and post-grazed conditions. Frequent species (those occurring at ≥30% of sampled pastures) were more active in grazed than pre-grazed pastures but showed similar activity between pre-grazed and post-grazed pastures. At the species level, Nyctalus noctula activity was significantly higher in post-grazed compared to pre-grazed pastures. Overall bat activity, infrequent species activity, and species richness did not differ among grazing phases. Our results capture immediate responses during grazing and brief post-grazing resource pulses within days. Thus, comparisons with cattle should be cautious, as many cattle studies span weeks to months on larger, higher-biomass pastures. Apparent differences likely reflect timeframe, pasture size, stocking rate, and dung processes as much as livestock type, highlighting the need to consider livestock and management context when assessing bat responses and designing conservation-oriented grazing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.