ArticlePloS one2026
A wearable monitoring system for running gait analysis by diffusion transformer.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional wearable monitoring devices often suffer from insufficient data accuracy and low posture recognition rates, making them inadequate for the demands of professional sports health monitoring. To address these issues, this study proposes a wearable monitoring system for running gait analysis based on the Diffusion Transformer (DiT). The system aims to achieve high-precision running posture recognition and real-time motion monitoring through multi-sensor data fusion and advanced deep learning architecture. First, a wearable system was developed using a nine-axis Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) inertial sensor and an UltraWide Band (UWB) positioning module. Data quality was enhanced through sensor calibration, noise compensation, and an adaptive filtering algorithm. Then, a DiT-LSTM running posture recognition model was constructed by integrating the DiT with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to perform posture recognition within the wearable system. Experimental results show that on the Human3.6M dataset, the DiT-LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 97.54%, a precision of 97.61%, a recall of 97.73%, an F1-score of 97.58%, and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 98.61%. On the HumanEva dataset, the model attained an accuracy of 96.39%, a precision of 96.47%, a recall of 96.8%, an F1-score of 96.92%, and an AUC of 97.9%, all outperforming other algorithms. The complexity assessment showed that DiT-LSTM reached 14.7 GFLOPs on the Human3.6M dataset, with a per-epoch training time of 62.3 seconds, while its per-sample inference latency was only 9.4 ms, meeting real-time monitoring requirements. In the UWB-based position drift correction experiment, Sample 1 achieved mean errors of 0.637 m, 0.581 m, and 0.349 m on the X/Y/Z axes, with corresponding RMSE values of 0.041 m, 0.023 m, and 0.025 m, demonstrating high positioning accuracy and stability. By combining multimodal sensors with the DiT-LSTM model, the study offers reliable technical support for running gait analysis, injury prevention, and personalized training guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.