ArticlePloS one2026
Partial privatization and intellectual capital: The moderating role of firm internationalization and regional development.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the impact of partial privatization on intellectual capital and investigates how corporate internationalization and regional development moderate this relationship. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms over the years of 2010-2023, this study employed Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) as the baseline regression. This study finds that partial privatization positively affects intellectual capital, thereby introducing opportunities about value creation within firms. Further investigations reveal that internationalization weakens the positive impact of partial privatization on intellectual capital, suggesting that exposure to international markets may heighten agency risks associated with a firm's global expansion. Our findings also show that regional development strengthens this positive relationship, since firms located in developed regions are better positioned to capitalize on the benefits of partial privatization. To ensure the robustness of these findings, we also use two Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methods to ensure the consistency of the findings. Overall, the results carry significant policy implications, especially concerning the corporate efficiency outcomes of privatization in emerging markets such as China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.