Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575980›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The child Musicality Index: A child-friendly version of the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index.

Chloe MacGregor, Solena Mednicoff, David J Vollweiler, Erin Hannon, Daniel Müllensiefen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chloe MacGregorDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8169-5454
Solena MednicoffDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.
David J VollweilerDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3971-0891
Erin HannonDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.
Daniel MüllensiefenDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7297-1760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) has contributed significantly to the study of musical sophistication in adolescence and adulthood, however the field lacks an equivalent self-report instrument for childhood. Existing measures focus heavily on instrumental learning and fail to consider social, emotional and motivational factors which are likely to underlie engagement with music. To address this gap, the current research introduces the child Musicality Index (cMI), a new psychometric self-report measure of musicality for 6- to 13-year-olds which captures children's motivation for and enjoyment of music. In study 1, a large cohort (N = 302) of children (6-13yrs) responded to items adapted from the Gold-MSI to suit a younger age range. Factor analysis (N = 283) was used to select 8 items for the children's version of the measure, split into two group factors ('musical drive' and 'enjoyment of music making') and one general factor ('musicality'). Studies 1b and 1c then investigated whether children's responses to these 8 items were valid and reliable (N = 250-460). Study 2 provided evidence for the psychometric properties of the final 8-item version of the task in a new sample (N = 56). The new, 8-item cMI provides a short and robust measure which can facilitate investigation of the most critical aspects of musicality during childhood. It has demonstrated good psychometric properties in UK and US samples and is now openly available for use in wider research.

Indexed as

MusicAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPsychometricsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID41575980
PMCPMC12829873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.