Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575954›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Assessing protected areas as climate refugia for threatened plant species in Britain.

Freya R Read, Rachel J Warmington, Colin M Beale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Freya R ReadLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7199-737X
Rachel J WarmingtonPlantlife, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
Colin M BealeLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-5666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is causing the loss or movement of suitable habitats, forcing species to undergo range shifts. However, many may be unable to move to suitable locations, resulting in increased extinctions. Climate refugia, areas maintaining suitable conditions for species now and in the future, offer protection from climate change. These refugia are categorised as in situ, where species are currently present, and ex situ, where they are not. We aimed to identify climate refugia for rare vascular plant species in Britain and examined whether refugia with the highest number of suitable species share any common features. Using predicted 2080 distributions, we identified protected areas in Britain that act as in situ or ex situ refugia for 12 of Plantlife's focal plant species. This study revealed that many current habitats will become unsuitable by 2080, highlighting the urgent need to protect refugia. The limited availability of in situ refugia underscores the importance of ex situ refugia as potential habitats. Our findings indicated that protected areas with higher elevations, larger elevational ranges, higher latitude and longitude and larger area will provide climate refugia for a greater number of species. This information can be used to guide the selection and management of protected areas and identify receptor sites for species introductions.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesPlantsRefugiumClimateEcosystemUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41575954
PMCPMC12829861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.