ArticlePloS one2026
Allied health care in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study on the perceptions of non-hospitalized patients and allied health professionals.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWorldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted access to primary care and rehabilitation services, leaving many non-hospitalized patients with persistent symptoms unsure where to seek support. Primary allied health care (pAHP) became an important source of guidance and rehabilitation in several countries. This qualitative study explored how pAHP was accessed, experienced, and delivered in the Netherlands during the early stages of the pandemic, focusing on non-hospitalized patients with lingering symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection and the allied health professionals who supported them.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted in the Netherlands between January and May 2021. Semi-structured interviews were held with 11 non-hospitalized patients and 30 primary allied health care professionals across five disciplines. Participants reflected on their experiences with primary allied health care during the first year of the pandemic. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsThree main themes described this period: (1) navigating uncertainty in the absence of guidelines and knowledge about the disease; (2) adapting care, balancing treatment content and delivery; and (3) forging connections, including interprofessional collaboration and organization in primary care. Patients generally reported positive experiences and valued feeling heard and supported, while professionals described adaptive strategies and organizational challenges.
conclusionsPrimary allied healthcare played a valued and adaptive role for non-hospitalized patients during the early pandemic. These findings underscore the importance of acknowledging patients' symptoms, strengthening interprofessional collaboration, and supporting flexible, evidence-informed care strategies to prepare primary care systems for future health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.