Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

LOTUS: A low-cost time-lapse automated imaging system for spatio-temporal analysis of microbial colony or biofilm development.

Ryunosuke Sakai, Yifan Zhao, Martin Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryunosuke SakaiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yifan ZhaoGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Martin RobertGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7082-5142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of low-cost single-board computers and 3D printers has considerably accelerated open science. In the life sciences, for both research and educational purposes, there is a growing trend to develop affordable imaging systems rather than purchasing specialized commercial instruments. However, existing solutions often lack diversity of imaging modes or adequate throughput. To fill this gap, we developed LOTUS, a low-cost (~$550 USD) automated imaging system built from 3-D printed components that integrates motorized sample positioning with interchangeable light-emitting diodes (LED) sources and optical filters for spatio-temporal analysis of microbial colony or biofilm development. LOTUS images up to nine samples at fixed time intervals (e.g., 20 min) in four modes: bright-field transillumination (biomass), bright-field epi-illumination (morphology), and dual-color epi-fluorescence (gene expression or other types of reporter analysis). Validation experiments demonstrated stable and reproducible timing and positioning accuracy over 3 days and homogeneity of LED illumination and captured images enabling semi-quantitative analysis. We demonstrated LOTUS capabilities by imaging E. coli biofilms expressing fluorescent reporter proteins (GFPmut2 and mCherry) over 5 days and tracking fluorescence intensity dynamics following sub-MIC ampicillin treatment. LOTUS represents a versatile and cost-effective semi-quantitative platform for parallel monitoring of colony or biofilm development and fluorescent reporter expression pattern. This open-source system makes automated time-lapse live imaging accessible for research and educational applications.

Indexed as

BiofilmsEscherichia coliTime-Lapse ImagingSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41575928
PMCPMC12829848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.