ArticlePloS one2026
Croaking for haste: How long does it take to describe a frog species since its discovery?
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global biodiversity faces severe anthropogenic threats, with alarming extinction rates projected for the near future. Most of Earth's diversity remains undescribed, meaning countless species are doomed to extinction before being documented. Since current conservation laws typically consider only described species, the lag time in achieving a representative global biodiversity inventory is a crucial issue impeding effective conservation. Amphibians, the most endangered vertebrate class, exemplify the challenge: while the number of threatened species rises, new species descriptions rapidly increase, and hundreds of candidate species are flagged annually. We analyzed all anuran species described from 2000 to 2023 across four biodiversity-rich tropical regions to investigate the time required to describe new frog species. We quantified the time needed to collect the type series, the number and timing of expeditions, the lag between collection and publication, and the total time. Additionally, we explored temporal trends and the effect of selected abiotic variables. The time-lag from the collection of the first specimen to the formal publication of a frog species description ranged from 0.4 to 125.7 years (median = 7.3, mean = 11.3), type series collection from 0 to 104.9 (median = 0.1, mean = 4.5), and description and publication from 0.2 to 54.6 (median = 4.4, mean = 6.8). Alarmingly, the time required to describe new species is globally increasing. Thirty-six percent of species were named within five years of first collection, highlighting the need for continued collecting, biological collections as reservoirs of undescribed diversity, and calling for specimen revision after expeditions. These results raise concerns about the effectiveness of current taxonomic and conservation practices addressing the biodiversity crisis. We call for a global effort to prioritize taxonomic research and discuss taxonomic and conservation approaches. Under current practices, and given the observed timelines, we will lose the race against extinction for many species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.