Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575921›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Croaking for haste: How long does it take to describe a frog species since its discovery?

Albert Carné, Alberto Sánchez-Vialas, Claudia Lansac, Miriam Moreno-Orosa, Ignacio De la Riva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Albert CarnéScience and Business S.L., Edificio CITEXVI, Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7920-8159
Alberto Sánchez-VialasDepartment of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0068-7669
Claudia LansacDepartment of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-1252
Miriam Moreno-OrosaBiodiversity Research Institute (IMIB), University of Oviedo-Principality of Asturias-CSIC, Mieres, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-1568-4795
Ignacio De la RivaDepartment of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5064-4507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global biodiversity faces severe anthropogenic threats, with alarming extinction rates projected for the near future. Most of Earth's diversity remains undescribed, meaning countless species are doomed to extinction before being documented. Since current conservation laws typically consider only described species, the lag time in achieving a representative global biodiversity inventory is a crucial issue impeding effective conservation. Amphibians, the most endangered vertebrate class, exemplify the challenge: while the number of threatened species rises, new species descriptions rapidly increase, and hundreds of candidate species are flagged annually. We analyzed all anuran species described from 2000 to 2023 across four biodiversity-rich tropical regions to investigate the time required to describe new frog species. We quantified the time needed to collect the type series, the number and timing of expeditions, the lag between collection and publication, and the total time. Additionally, we explored temporal trends and the effect of selected abiotic variables. The time-lag from the collection of the first specimen to the formal publication of a frog species description ranged from 0.4 to 125.7 years (median = 7.3, mean = 11.3), type series collection from 0 to 104.9 (median = 0.1, mean = 4.5), and description and publication from 0.2 to 54.6 (median = 4.4, mean = 6.8). Alarmingly, the time required to describe new species is globally increasing. Thirty-six percent of species were named within five years of first collection, highlighting the need for continued collecting, biological collections as reservoirs of undescribed diversity, and calling for specimen revision after expeditions. These results raise concerns about the effectiveness of current taxonomic and conservation practices addressing the biodiversity crisis. We call for a global effort to prioritize taxonomic research and discuss taxonomic and conservation approaches. Under current practices, and given the observed timelines, we will lose the race against extinction for many species.

Indexed as

AnuraEndangered SpeciesAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID41575921
PMCPMC12829843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.