ArticlePloS one2026
Social inclusion among young adults with mental illness and complex needs in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: A qualitative study on team staff's understanding and experiences.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial inclusion is increasingly highlighted through policies, practices, research, and broader societal awareness. Young adults with mental illness and complex needs are among the most marginalized in society and face significant challenges. Public health and welfare services play a critical role in either facilitating or hindering social inclusion through adequate or inadequate service provision. The services are often critiqued for treating individuals in isolation from their social contexts.
methodsIn this qualitative study semi-structural individual interviews and thematic analysis were used to explore: How do service providers in FACT teams understand and promote social inclusion among young adults with mental illness and complex needs?.
resultsThe results showed that staff employed efforts to promote social inclusion and acknowledged this as important. However, they had limited conceptual understanding and revealed a lack of systematic promotion in the teams. Several barriers for social inclusion were evident in the material, from individual and structural to societal.
conclusionsThere is a need to develop and operationalize the concept to enable systematic and holistic approaches to promote social inclusion, moving beyond employing single interventions. Policies must be developed, and training and education provided to create context sensitive mental health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.