ArticleASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)2026
Impact of Inflow Ratio on a Double-Inflow Cavopulmonary Assist Device.
Article in ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Fontan circulation is a palliative treatment for univentricular heart disease but is prone to progressive hemodynamic failure. To address this, a novel cavopulmonary assist device (CPAD) with dual inlets from the superior and inferior caval veins was developed. This study examines how varying inflow ratios (IRs) affect the CPAD's hydraulic performance, hemocompatibility, and flow estimation accuracy. Hydraulic performance, represented by the pressure head-flow (H-Q) characteristics, was experimentally and numerically assessed at different IRs. Hemolysis was evaluated experimentally at the nominal operating point (4 L/min, 2,500 RPM) for IRs of 1:1 and 1:3 (n = 5). Additionally, hemocompatibility-related metrics were determined numerically. Furthermore, the robustness of conventional flow estimation methods, based on motor current, pump speed, and viscosity, under varying IRs was examined. In vitro and in silico results indicated low variations in both hydraulic performance (ΔH < 2.2 mm Hg) and hemolysis(22.4% in measured Normalized Index of Hemolysis [NIH]; 4.9% in predicted damage index [DI]) across all investigated IRs. The flow estimation model based on motor current, rotational speed, and fluid viscosity showed high accuracy regardless of the IR, with root mean square error (RMSE) less than 0.148 L/min and R ² greater than 0.99. The analyzed double-inflow CPAD performed reliably across the investigated IRs, supporting its suitability for a broad patient population and enabling precise flow monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.