Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575713›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2026

Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling Framework for Cancer Interventions and Population Health in R (DESCIPHR): An Open-Source Pipeline.

Selina Pi, Carolyn M Rutter, Carlos Pineda-Antunez, Jonathan H Chen, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert, Fernando Alarid-Escudero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Selina PiDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur, Edwards, Floor 3, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. sjpi@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9940-1925
Carolyn M RutterHutch Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Biostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Carlos Pineda-AntunezThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Jonathan H ChenStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 3180 Porter Dr, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Jeremy D Goldhaber-FiebertDepartment of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 615 Crothers Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Fernando Alarid-EscuderoDepartment of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 615 Crothers Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. falarid@stanford.edu.

Funding

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute U01-CA253913Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute U01-CA265750National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2146755U.S. National Library of Medicine T15LM007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation models inform health policy decisions by integrating data from multiple sources and forecasting outcomes when there is a lack of comprehensive evidence from empirical studies. Such models have long supported health policy for cancer, the first or second leading cause of death in over 100 countries. Discrete-event simulation (DES) and Bayesian calibration have gained traction in the field of decision science because they enable flexible modeling of complex health conditions and produce estimates of model parameters that reflect real-world disease epidemiology and data uncertainty given model constraints. This uncertainty is then propagated to model-generated outputs, enabling decision-makers to assess confidence in recommendations and estimate the value of collecting additional information. However, there is limited end-to-end guidance on structuring a DES model for cancer progression, estimating its parameters using Bayesian calibration, and applying the calibration outputs to policy evaluation. To fill this gap, we introduce the DES Modeling Framework for Cancer Interventions and Population Health in R (DESCIPHR), an open-source codebase integrating a flexible DES model for the natural history of cancer, Bayesian calibration for parameter estimation, and an example application of screening strategy evaluation. To illustrate the framework, we apply DESCIPHR to calibrate bladder and colorectal cancer models to real-world cancer registry targets. We also introduce an automated method for generating data-informed parameter prior distributions and increase the functionality of a neural network emulator-based Bayesian calibration algorithm. We anticipate that the adaptable DESCIPHR modeling template will facilitate the construction of future decision models evaluating the risks and benefits of health interventions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDecision Support TechniquesNeoplasmsPopulation HealthBayes TheoremCalibrationDisease ProgressionHealth PolicyHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41575713
PMCPMC13013340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.