ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Comparative evaluation of weaning and feeding strategies in lamb production: effects on carcass and meat characteristics.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of weaning age and three feeding systems on slaughter traits, carcass characteristics, and meat quality in lambs. Forty-five lambs were divided into three groups. Group I lambs were grazed and suckled, Group II lambs were weaned and raised in stable, and Group III lambs were weaned and grazed. Lambs were slaughtered on the 135th day. Body weights on day 75 were similar across groups, but slaughter traits on day 135 were lower in Group III. Head, feet, and heart percentages were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in Group I. Additionally, carcass and hind limb compactness indices were significantly higher in Group I than in Group III (P = 0.001 and P = 0.022, respectively). Group I also had a significantly higher lean percentage (P < 0.001), whereas Group II had a significantly higher fat percentage (P = 0.008). Carcasses from Groups I and III exhibited greater lightness (P = 0.001), and meat from Groups I and II had higher Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) values (P = 0.024). In conclusion, Group III exhibited superior meat quality, Group II showed better carcass traits, while Group I demonstrated the most balanced overall performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.