ArticleFolia microbiologica2026
Structure-based and machine learning-assisted identification of natural phytochemicals targeting Mycobacterium leprae InhA for anti-mycobacterial therapeutics.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) is the bacterium that causes leprosy. It is a public health problem in many regions, especially in developing countries. The situation is getting worse and worse as drug resistance spreads. InhA is one of the most important proteins for M. leprae's survival. It helps make mycolic acid, an important part of the bacterial cell envelope; hence, InhA is a good target for developing new anti-leprosy drugs. In this study, we focused on identifying natural plant-derived compounds (phytochemicals) capable of inhibiting InhA function using sophisticated computer-based techniques, including molecular docking, simulations, DFT calculations, and machine learning. After structure-based virtual screening, docking scores helped us narrow down the list to Hinokiflavone, 3,29-Dibenzoyl Rarounitriol, and 4'-O-Methylochnaflavone. Molecular dynamics simulations (500 ns) showed that Hinokiflavone and 4'-O-Methylochnaflavone had stable binding and only small changes, which confirmed that the protein-ligand interactions were strong. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Free Energy Landscape (FEL) analyses showed that the InhA-ligand complexes were stable in shape and exhibited clear low-energy states. Frontier Molecular Orbital (FMO) analysis showed that the reactivity and electronic profiles were good, especially for Hinokiflavone, which had a small HOMO-LUMO gap. Furthermore, a machine-learning-based QSAR model was used to predict the biological activity values (pIC₅₀) of these compounds post-simulation. The best KNN model showed that the pIC₅₀ values of these compounds were greater than 7.0, exceeding the activity threshold of pIC₅₀ ≥ 6.0. This means they are active inhibitors. These results underscore the potential of these phytochemicals as InhA inhibitors for the management of M. leprae infections and offer a robust in silico prediction for subsequent experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41575667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.