ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Somatostatin receptor expression for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn this prospective study, we aimed to investigate the factors associated with somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in patients with recurrent or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).
methodsPatients with DTC scheduled for 131I therapy at the study institution were enrolled. The inclusion criteria required at least one assessable lesion (≥ 1 cm). SSTR expression was assessed by 111In-pentetreotide single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), with Krenning scores of ≥ 2 considered positive. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and post-131I therapy SPECT/CT were also evaluated. Quantitative evaluation was performed using standardized uptake values (SUV). Clinical factors were compared between SSTR-positive and SSTR-negative patients. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between lesion size and SUVmax from 111In-pentetreotide SPECT, FDG PET, and 131I SPECT. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were utilized to identify predictors of SSTR positivity, accounting for within-patient correlation among multiple lesions. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with clustered bootstrap resampling were used for evaluating the diagnostic performance of significant predictors.
resultsFourteen patients with DTC (six male; median age, 70.5 years) were evaluated, and 31 lesions were assessed. High SSTR expression was observed in 28.6% (4/14) of patients and 51.6% (16/31) of lesions. SSTR positivity was associated with follicular histology, elevated thyroglobulin (Tg) levels, 131I uptake, larger lesion size, and bone metastasis. Using GEEs accounting for intra-patient clustering, higher 131I SUVmax was the strongest independent predictor of SSTR positivity (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated 131I SUVmax yielded a high area under the curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.65–1.00) for predicting SSTR positivity. SSTR SUVmax positively correlated with lesion size (ρ = 0.67), and 131I SUVmax (ρ = 0.73). Although 18F-FDG SUVmax moderately positively correlated with SSTR SUVmax (ρ = 0.49), it was not an independent predictor of SSTR positivity in GEE (p = 0.163).
conclusionsIn this first study, high SSTR expression in Japanese patients with DTC was evaluated, demonstrating patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma, elevated Tg levels, larger tumor size, and positive 131I uptake are more likely to have SSTR-positive lesions. These findings might support the development of novel SSTR-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapies for DTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.