ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Distal thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: is a 0.008-inch wire a safer alternative?
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) thrombectomy remains challenging due to anatomical constraints and procedural risks. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of using a 0.008-inch J-shaped microguidewire in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with DMVO. We retrospectively analyzed AIS patients who underwent DMVO thrombectomy using a 0.008-inch J-shaped microguidewire at a high-volume stroke center in 2024. Baseline characteristics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), IV-tPA administration, occlusion location, and procedural complications were recorded. Successful recanalization was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c-3, while good clinical outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at 90 days. Among 441 AIS patients treated with thrombectomy in 2024, 84 had DMVO, and 32 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 75 ± 12 years, range 32-93). Primary DMVO was identified in 19 cases, while 13 had secondary DMVO following proximal thrombectomy. The mean NIHSS was 11 ± 3.4 (range 7-21). The occlusion sites were M2 (n = 21), A3 (n = 6), M3 (n = 4), P2 (n = 2), and M4 (n = 1) segments. Successful recanalization was achieved in 90.6% (n = 29), with one patient requiring rescue stenting. No guidewire-related complications occurred. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was observed in 6.3% (n = 2), one of whom underwent decompression. The rate of good clinical outcomes was 53.1%, and 3 patients (9.3%) died. Neurointerventionalists are looking for better techniques to reduce the risks associated with distal thrombectomy. Our findings suggest that using a 0.008-inch J-shaped microguidewire may enhance procedural safety and success in DMVO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41575631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.