ArticleOral radiology2026
Volumetric dimensions of the maxillary sinus affect infraorbital canal configurations? A CBCT study.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between maxillary sinus volume (MSV) and morphological variations of the infraorbital canal (IOC) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Secondary aims were to determine the frequency of IOC types and accessory canals, and to examine the relationship between them.
methodsIOC variations were classified according to their protrusion pattern. IOC variations were classified into three patterns: Type 1 (canal embedded in the sinus roof), Type 2 (canal descending below the roof but still attached to it), and Type 3 (canal hanging within the sinus cavity). MSV was calculated using three-dimensional reconstruction. The presence of accessory canals was recorded. A one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the relationship between IOC variations and MSV, while a chi-square test assessed the association between IOC types and accessory canal presence.
resultsThe most frequently observed IOC type was Type 2 (46.5%), followed by Type 1 (29.3%) and Type 3 (24.2%). The mean MSV for Type 1 IOC was lower than for Type 2 and Type 3 (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in MSV between Type 2 and Type 3 (p > 0.05). No significant relationship was found between the presence of accessory foramina and IOC types (p = 0.612).
conclusionPreoperative three-dimensional imaging of MSV and IOC variations is crucial for enhancing surgical precision and minimizing complications in maxillofacial procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41575621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.