ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Endovascular treatment outcomes in patients with residual cerebral aneurysmatic filling after open surgery.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Residual or recurrent aneurysmatic filling may be detected during follow-up after open aneurysm surgery and can necessitate retreatment. In this study, we descriptively report the safety and radiological/clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients who previously underwent microsurgical clipping (MSC) or surgical wrapping. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated between 2012 and 2022 at Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital and Ankara City Hospital. Demographics, timing of initial surgery and EVT, aneurysm location, and EVT modality (flow diverter, stent-assisted coiling, primary coiling) were recorded. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Radiological outcomes were assessed using the O’Kelly–Marotta (OKM) scale for flow diversion and the Modified Raymond–Roy Classification (MRRC) for coiling techniques. Procedure-related complications, mortality, and permanent morbidity were evaluated. A total of 70 aneurysms in 68 patients were treated. Complete occlusion (OKM-D or MRRC-1) was achieved in 64% of aneurysms at follow-up; when near-complete occlusion (OKM-C or MRRC-2) was included, the overall angiographic success rate was 92%. Permanent morbidity was 4.4% and mortality was 1.4%. Functional outcomes improved over follow-up, and clinical results were generally favorable across EVT techniques. EVT appears to be a feasible and effective retreatment option in selected patients with residual or recurrent aneurysmatic filling after prior open aneurysm surgery. Given the retrospective design and limited subgroup sizes, the present findings should be interpreted as descriptive. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to further define optimal retreatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.