Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575594›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Effects of eye cap occlusion on visual distance and fixating duration of pecking in pigeons.

Kenta Wada, Ei-Ichi Izawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenta WadaDepartment of Psychology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan. wake13242@keio.jp.
Ei-Ichi IzawaDepartment of Psychology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan. ei.izawa@oist.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI #23H00074Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI #24KJ1956Keio University Grant-in-Aid for ICRP #MKJ1905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian pecking behavior in birds, analogous to reach-to-grasp in primates, is accompanied by unstable vision due to the co-location of the eyes and bills on the head. Fixation in birds, a brief pause during pecking, enables them to stabilize their visual input to plan their further movements. Several bird species have two high-acuity retinal regions, the area dorsalis and the fovea centralis, which receive input from frontal and lateral visual fields, respectively. However, the contributions of these regions to natural pecking during fixation, especially temporal dynamics and head posture involved in accommodation, remain poorly understood. We assessed the effects of visual-field-specific occlusion on the fixation behavior of pigeons, provided with three types of eye caps: frontal occlusion, lateral occlusion, and a no-occlusion control. Using video tracking methods, we analyzed the visual distance toward the target, fixation duration, head depression angle, and the covariation between visual distance and duration. Frontal occlusion markedly prolonged fixation duration and increased the head depression angle, whereas visual distance remained unaffected across conditions. Furthermore, the covariation between visual distance and fixation duration under control condition was abolished under frontal occlusion. These results suggest that the role of frontal vision involves the area dorsalis in temporal and postural compensation for accommodation during fixation of pecking.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDistance PerceptionFixation, OcularVisual FieldsAnimalsColumbidaeArea dorsalisEye cap occlusionFixationFovea centralisRetina

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.