ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Exploring molecular signatures in PURA syndrome using muscle proteomics and serum biomarkers.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeDominant PURA variants (encoding purine-rich element-binding protein A) cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with hypotonia, cognitive impairment, and variable neuromuscular symptoms. Clinical presentations and response to pyridostigmine, moreover, highlighted neuromuscular junction (NMJ) involvement. However, NMJ architecture, underlying molecular mechanisms, and potential minimally invasive biomarkers in PURA syndrome remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to profile PURA-related disease using integrated clinical, histological, ultrastructural, transcriptional, and protein analyses of skeletal muscle and blood.
methodsTen genetically confirmed patients underwent detailed phenotyping with emphasis on congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS)-like features. Quadriceps biopsy from one patient was analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. Protein profiling of muscle, serum, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) was performed by ELISA and mass spectrometry, with validation by qPCR.
resultsIn line with the recognized classification of PURA syndrome as a CMS subtype, our patients exhibited hypotonia, ptosis, ocular weakness, and myopathic facies, reflecting impaired neuromuscular transmission. Subtle vesicle accumulation and minor NMJ alterations suggest possible neuromuscular involvement in PURA syndrome. Muscle proteomics showed reduced PURA protein and dysregulation of transcriptional regulation, vesicle transport, extracellular matrix remodeling, and complement activation. qPCR confirmed POSTN and PHGDH upregulation among others. Serum analyses demonstrated elevated TSP4, identifying a promising candidate blood biomarker for PURA-associated NMJ dysfunction. EV proteomics revealed dysregulated immunoglobulins, complement components, and novel candidates including NOTCH2, TARSH, and PON1.
conclusionsPathogenic PURA variants may impair NMJ structure and vesicle homeostasis, potentially linking molecular and ultrastructural defects with clinical myasthenic features and pyridostigmine responsiveness. Proteomic analysis of skeletal muscle provides initial molecular insights into the consequences of dominant PURA variants in muscle tissue. The identification of TSP4 and extracellular vesicle-associated proteins as potential minimally invasive biomarkers provides a framework for biochemical monitoring of PURA syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.