ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Microplastic and skin-an update].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroplastics (MPs) are polymeric particles ranging from 1-5000 µm in size; while a rather limited share is intentionally manufactured, the majority is generated through abrasion during plastic use or results from environmental fragmentation of larger plastic pieces. These persistent emerging pollutants potentially harm fauna, flora, and humans. Nanoplastics (NPs) comprise identical materials but are smaller than 1 µm (1000 nm); due to their small size, they potentially cross epithelial barriers.
objectivesOutlining occurrence and biological effects of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) on skin and mucosa and its environmental dermatologic relevance. MATERIALS AND
methodsLiterature search using PubMed and Google Scholar regarding the terms 'microplastics', 'nanoplastics', 'skin' and "cutan*" without time limit to provide a narrative review.
resultsThe in vivo effects of MNPs on cutaneous physiology remain largely unknown. However, environmental MNPs may carry harmful chemicals and pathogens and there is in vitro evidence indicating proinflammatory and cytotoxic effects as well as promoting senescence.
conclusionExperimental approaches investigating MNP effects on skin health face significant limitations and implementation challenges. Given the ubiquitous environmental occurrence of MNP particles, extensive research is warranted to understand their occurrence, fate, and skin health impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41575509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.