Trial reportKidney3602026
Impact of Loop Diuretics on Long-Term Kidney Outcome: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STOP-Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Trial.
Trial report in Kidney360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsRenin-angiotensin system inhibitors have less effect on decline in eGFR and no greater effect on delaying ESKD/KRT in patients receiving loop diuretics compared with those who do. Although loop diuretic use was not associated with higher rates of ESKD/KRT, it might be associated with a higher mortality. The decline in eGFR was slower in those taking loop diuretics.
backgroundIn the STOP-Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor trial, patients with advanced CKD were randomized to continue or stop renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and showed no difference in kidney outcomes. This post hoc analysis investigates interactions with loop diuretic use.
methodsPatients with eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 and progressive CKD were randomized to stop or continue RASi. Primary outcome was eGFR over 3 years using repeated-measures, mixed-effects linear regression, random-slope models. Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios for time-to-event outcomes, including ESKD and KRT.
resultsAt baseline, eGFR, arterial pressure, and proteinuria were similar for 133 patients taking loop diuretics and 278 who were not. Those receiving loop diuretics at randomization, least-squares mean (±SE) eGFR at 3 years was 12.3 (±1.1) for those stopping compared with 10.1 (±1.2) for those continuing RASi, trend favoring stopping RASi (+2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.9 to 5.4), but eGFR slope over 3 years was similar (-7.2 versus -7.7 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ). Those not receiving loop diuretics, eGFR at 3-years was 8.8 (±0.8) and 11.6 (±0.8; discontinue and continue RASi groups), a difference favoring continuing RASi (-2.8; 95% CI, -4.9 to -0.8), and a steeper eGFR slope for those discontinuing RASi (-9.9 versus -7.6 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ). The interaction between loop diuretic use and the effect of RASi on eGFR at 3 years and the three-way interaction between diuretic subgroup, effect of RASi, and time were both statistically significant ( P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). Of patients taking loop diuretics, 73 (55%) developed ESKD/KRT and 23 (17%) died. Of patients not taking loop diuretics, 170 (61%) developed ESKD/KRT and 19 (7%) died.
conclusionsWithdrawal of RASi was associated with a steeper decline in eGFR over 3 years in those not receiving loop diuretics, but this was not observed in those who were taking loop diuretics. Patients receiving loop diuretics had a high mortality. These data support the need for randomized trials investigating the efficacy and safety of loop diuretics in patients with advanced CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.