Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575447›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Differential effects of attention and contrast on transition appearance during binocular rivalry.

Cemre Yilmaz, Kerstin Maitz, Maximilian Gerschütz, Wilfried Grassegger, Anja Ischebeck, Andreas Bartels, Natalia Zaretskaya

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cemre YilmazDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Kerstin MaitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Maximilian GerschützDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Wilfried GrasseggerDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Anja IschebeckDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andreas BartelsDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Natalia ZaretskayaDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular rivalry occurs when two eyes are presented with two conflicting stimuli. Although the physical stimulation stays the same, the conscious percept changes over time. This property makes it a unique paradigm in both vision science and consciousness research. Two key parameters, contrast and attention, were repeatedly shown to affect binocular rivalry dynamics in a similar manner. This was taken as evidence that attention acts by enhancing effective stimulus contrast. Brief transition periods between the two clear percepts have so far been much less investigated. In a previous study we demonstrated that transition periods can appear in different forms depending on the stimulus type and the observer. In the current study, we investigated how attention and contrast affect transition appearance. Observers viewed binocular rivalry and reported their perception of the four most common transition types by a button press while either the stimulus contrast or the locus of exogenous attention was manipulated. We show that contrast and attention similarly affect the overall binocular rivalry dynamics, but their effects on the appearance of transitions differ. These results suggest that the effect of attention is different from a simple enhancement of stimulus strength, which becomes evident only when different transition types are considered.

Indexed as

AttentionContrast SensitivityDominance, OcularVision, BinocularVision DisparityHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41575447
PMCPMC12854236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.