ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior2026
Stakeholder Perspectives on Remote Delivery of a Group-Based Child Obesity Prevention Program for Latino Families With Low Income.
Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore attitudes and preferences related to remote nutrition education programming for Latino families in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and primary care.
designCommunity-engaged, qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews and focus groups.
settingPrenatal and pediatric primary care and WIC sites in Manhattan, Queens, and Nassau Counties, New York.
participantsFour stakeholder groups: (1) past participants of a primary care-based obesity prevention program (Starting Early Program Prenatal) for Latino families that transitioned to remote delivery because of coronavirus disease 2019 (n = 40), (2) Latina WIC participants, including pregnant women and mothers of young children (n = 40), (3) Starting Early Program Prenatal staff (n = 6), and (4) WIC staff (n = 16). PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Attitudes and preferences related to in-person vs remote nutrition education programming. ANALYSIS: Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for emergent themes using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsFour themes emerged: (1) valuing in-person social connection while recognizing barriers to in-person gathering, (2) navigating distraction-related barriers to remote engagement, (3) consistent content delivery but uncertain quality of remote programs, and (4) coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic-related contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Future remote programs in WIC may benefit from incorporating opportunities for social interaction, explicit discussion of anticipated barriers, and strategies to overcome them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.