ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Possible overestimation of treatment effects of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective propensity-score weighted multi-center cohort study.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe treatment effects of lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) reported in previous studies may have been overestimated owing to confounding factors. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effect of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PeNPAN) in early-stage OCCC, with careful adjustment for potential confounders.
methodsThis retrospective multi-center cohort study involved women with preoperatively suspected stage I OCCC. We included patients who underwent surgery for OCCC between 2005 and 2019 at 11 affiliated institutions. The exposure (PeNPAN) group comprised patients who underwent PeNPAN. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, hazard ratios (HRs) of lymphadenectomy for DFS were estimated using unadjusted and propensity score-weighted Cox regression models and biased models applied in previous studies. To identify strong confounders, we further examined factors associated with recurrence that differed between the groups.
resultsWe analyzed 304 women who underwent surgery for preoperatively suspected stage I OCCC. The unadjusted HR for DFS was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.36-1.09; p=0.10), and the propensity-score adjusted HR was 0.82 (95% CI=0.42-1.58; p=0.55). The biased model showed a statistically significant HR of 0.59 (95% CI=0.36-1.00; p=0.048). Adhesions in the Douglas' pouch and cardiovascular disease were associated with recurrence and were more prevalent in the control group, suggesting potential confounders.
conclusionAfter adjusting for potential confounders, the observed treatment effects of lymphadenectomy in the biased models were no longer statistically significant. Future investigations should carefully account for possible confounders, including intraoperative adhesions and comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.